<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LOOKING FOR TROUBLE</title>
	<atom:link href="http://oldhamps.wordpress.com/2008/07/24/looking-for-trouble/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://oldhamps.wordpress.com/2008/07/24/looking-for-trouble/</link>
	<description>Oldham Photographic Society</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 18:00:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: bluetwo</title>
		<link>http://oldhamps.wordpress.com/2008/07/24/looking-for-trouble/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>bluetwo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 07:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oldhamps.wordpress.com/?p=141#comment-48</guid>
		<description>Yes and its a pleasure to be a member of a club with so many good cooks -  On occasions I still use a battered brassy and bent old Contax RTS with 50mm lens (the first camera I ever bought from new) and get some funny looks as well as remarks from other photographers - we really are a funny lot - I dont have a leaning to any one brand of camera - my digital of choice at the moment is Nikon but thats because I find it easy to understand ( I dont have a use for the two thirds I dont understand) gives me the results I like and is easy work with - if someone brought out a digital camera that had just a manual and aperture priority program was capable of a 20x16 print and came with a two page user manual I would be the first to buy no matter  what name was on the front of it - for those who prefer to do projected images I believe most modern phone cameras can give very acceptable results and certainly the more up market compacts do - the Canon G9 comes to mind light and compact gives stunning results and if I did not need  to change to wider and longer focal lengths would be my choice - I recently had the use of a Samsung and for someone with good computer skills as a lot going for it - being an old darkroom worker who was use to 20x16 prints I looked for the digital equivalent - its definitely out there but at a price beyond my means -  I enjoy the challenge but in this age of technology I am still only a dish washer in the league of digital master chefs and try to get as much right as possible in camera like we use to do with trannies
Ken</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes and its a pleasure to be a member of a club with so many good cooks &#8211;  On occasions I still use a battered brassy and bent old Contax RTS with 50mm lens (the first camera I ever bought from new) and get some funny looks as well as remarks from other photographers &#8211; we really are a funny lot &#8211; I dont have a leaning to any one brand of camera &#8211; my digital of choice at the moment is Nikon but thats because I find it easy to understand ( I dont have a use for the two thirds I dont understand) gives me the results I like and is easy work with &#8211; if someone brought out a digital camera that had just a manual and aperture priority program was capable of a 20&#215;16 print and came with a two page user manual I would be the first to buy no matter  what name was on the front of it &#8211; for those who prefer to do projected images I believe most modern phone cameras can give very acceptable results and certainly the more up market compacts do &#8211; the Canon G9 comes to mind light and compact gives stunning results and if I did not need  to change to wider and longer focal lengths would be my choice &#8211; I recently had the use of a Samsung and for someone with good computer skills as a lot going for it &#8211; being an old darkroom worker who was use to 20&#215;16 prints I looked for the digital equivalent &#8211; its definitely out there but at a price beyond my means &#8211;  I enjoy the challenge but in this age of technology I am still only a dish washer in the league of digital master chefs and try to get as much right as possible in camera like we use to do with trannies<br />
Ken</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://oldhamps.wordpress.com/2008/07/24/looking-for-trouble/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 06:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oldhamps.wordpress.com/?p=141#comment-47</guid>
		<description>Cunningly, bluetwo, (newly rejoined member Ken Nolan to the rest of you!), only Mike and I have the &quot;power&quot; that comes with being administrators to create new parent categories. Anyhow, I&#039;ve put one in called &quot;Equipment&quot; and added yours to it, also will add one called &quot;Rants&quot;, as I think yours fits that too! :-)

Back to the substance of your blog - I did enjoy your tale of the silverware and I heartily agree with your sentiments. I get totally bemused by people asking me what make of camera I use when I lecture at clubs. As a minority Pentax user, I come across some very odd comments in return, like &quot;I didn&#039;t think anybody used Pentax&quot; for example or even worse &quot;I didn&#039;t think you could take good photos with Pentax&quot;. But, as in cooking, the proof of the pudding is in the eating! BTW - you didin&#039;t tell us what equipment you&#039;re using now ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cunningly, bluetwo, (newly rejoined member Ken Nolan to the rest of you!), only Mike and I have the &#8220;power&#8221; that comes with being administrators to create new parent categories. Anyhow, I&#8217;ve put one in called &#8220;Equipment&#8221; and added yours to it, also will add one called &#8220;Rants&#8221;, as I think yours fits that too! <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Back to the substance of your blog &#8211; I did enjoy your tale of the silverware and I heartily agree with your sentiments. I get totally bemused by people asking me what make of camera I use when I lecture at clubs. As a minority Pentax user, I come across some very odd comments in return, like &#8220;I didn&#8217;t think anybody used Pentax&#8221; for example or even worse &#8220;I didn&#8217;t think you could take good photos with Pentax&#8221;. But, as in cooking, the proof of the pudding is in the eating! BTW &#8211; you didin&#8217;t tell us what equipment you&#8217;re using now <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
